Partnership dilemmas: solutions and strategies for growth

In the world of business, partnerships can be both a source of strength and a fountain of frustration. The complexity of merging two distinct entities with their own visions, cultures, and goals brings about an intricate dance of collaboration. In this crucible, dilemmas are born.

From the division of responsibilities to balancing the books, partnerships face a myriad of challenges that can inhibit growth if not addressed properly. Technical hurdles, financial disagreements, and divisive priorities are but the tip of the iceberg in a sea of potential conflicts.

This article seeks to unravel the tangled web of partnership challenges, offering actionable solutions and strategies for overcoming obstacles and fostering long-term relationships. As we delve into the nuances of communication, trust, and the delicate balance between personalization and scale, a roadmap emerges for a successful partnership.

Technical dilemmas

Partnerships can indeed be tricky at multiple levels, posing various challenges that vary based on the partner network's size, the company's magnitude, the sophistication of strategy, and the size of the alliance's team. As companies grow and evolve, the obstacles encountered often reflect their current operational scope and long-term aspirations.

Initially, organizations may rely on rudimentary tools such as Excel spreadsheets or a basic Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system. However, these solutions quickly become inadequate as the partnership scales. To handle growing demands, a Partner Relationship Management (PRM like Partnerplace) system becomes crucial. Yet, the cost of implementing a robust PRM can be significant — potentially prohibitive when partnerships are still maturing and not generating substantial revenue.

Still, even if you use an inhouse tool, older systems often display significant shortcomings, offering poor user experiences for both partnership managers and partners. Such platforms might be unresponsive, not user-friendly, or lack essential modern features, hampering effective collaborations. Lastly, the reliance on legacy in-house systems presents challenges of its own, with continuous maintenance and development demands requiring substantial resource allocation. When thinking of the cost of using a PRM, you should compare it to both the revenue the channel is generating, as well as missed chances you are not getting because of your legacy system.

It is worth mentioning, that PRMs come in different shapes and sizes. From complex beasts aimed at enterprise customers, to tools meant for SMB companies (such as Partnerplace).

You can generally divide the technical concerns into three main areas: initial technology, scalability, and system usability.

Financial dilemmas

One notable dilemma is the entry barrier for potential partners who face upfront fees to join the partnership network. A tiered approach can alleviate this by offering a baseline, no-cost level of partnership, with more benefits available at premium, paid partner levels.

Another common financial hurdle is the distribution of leads amongst partners, which can be particularly thorny when multiple partners lay claim to the same prospect. To prevent conflict, it's crucial to have a predetermined strategy outlined possibly within the partnership agreement. Options might include honoring the first claim, considering partnership levels to prioritize lead ownership, or even splitting commissions in scenarios where one partner generates the lead while another finalizes the sale.

Finally, the timeliness of payments is often a bone of contention. Partners typically dislike waiting for payment disbursements, particularly when there are long lead times on invoices being settled by end customers. It is essential for the partner organization to maintain honest and effective communication regarding payment processes, providing regular updates on the status and expected timelines, especially if the wait extends beyond 30 days. In such cases, providing a formal notification detailing the payment stage can help manage expectations and maintain trust within the partnership.

Honest communication

Managing the intricate web of communication within partnerships can often lead to dilemmas that can make or break the foundations of a collaborative effort. A paramount issue arises when one partner oversteps by making commitments or disclosures to customers on behalf of the vendor without proper authority. Such actions can lead to confusion and potential loss of sales.

To prevent this, it’s essential to establish clear communication boundaries right from the onboarding stage. And then, any time such a situation occurs, it is crucial to reaffirm these limits with transparency and directness, both internally and externally. Yes - you must also reenforce these rules internally to the partnership and sales team. This will help the whole team learn how to handle such situations.

Partners are also in constant communication with each other, and inconsistent treatment can quickly erode trust. Should one partner receive preferential treatment—perhaps due to bringing in more leads or fitting a lead profile more snugly—the rationale must be communicated openly to maintain a harmonious partner network. You need to have a good answer why you did something if a partner challenges your decision.

At the heart of these communication conundrums, it is honesty and consistent dialogue that reinforce the health of the partnership. Fostering an ethos of effective communication can lead to robust, lasting business partnerships.

Culture of trust

Trust dilemmas surface in a multitude of forms, with partners often harboring apprehensions about sharing leads. They fear these precious assets could be redirected to other partners, thus compromising their competitive edge. This is something I have heard multiple times from partners: "how do I know you will not share my lead with others".

To combat these fears and foster a thriving business alliance, it's imperative to embody transparency and accountability within the partnership agreement. Ensuring that the division and protection of leads are unequivocally outlined can provide a sturdy foundation for mutual confidence.

Moreover, a proactive measure is to keep a pulse on partner satisfaction rates. Regularly evaluating these insights not only serves to fine-tune the partnership dynamics but also amplifies credibility on a public pedestal. Documenting and celebrating these success stories can become a compelling testament to the partnership's integrity and resolve against the lack of trust.

Ideas to combat partner fears:

• Define lead division clearly in partnership agreements
• Regular satisfaction rate assessments
• Public display of partnership successes to build credibility and showcase your strong relationships

Strategic partners vs other partner types

Partnerships, whether small or grand, demand careful steering to avoid the pitfalls of misalignment and miscommunication. On that note, the feeling of being undervalued should not be underestimated, as this is one of the typical partnership dilemmas that businesses frequently encounter.

It's not uncommon for partners to feel sidelined when another relationship seems to glean more focus, especially when this perceived favoritism has geopolitical dimensions—such as when partners are located in smaller markets (imagine a partner from Poland feeling they are in the shadow of giants like the USA). The resultant feelings of neglect can risk the health of the partnership, and in the worst cases, may even prompt partners to withdraw their collaboration entirely.

Addressing such issues requires sensitive and strategic prioritization. Balancing attention across partners, while clearly communicating each one's significance in the broader business strategy, is key. No, you don't have to treat every one equally, but you need to be transparent about what you can offer them - and then make sure you deliver on that promise.

Size dilemmas

Should you maintain a small, closely-knit partner network or expand to a vast, lead-generating machine? Each avenue has its merits and challenges.

Opting for a smaller network paves the way for more intimate interactions, simplifying management and the handling of commissions. This personal touch can foster stronger, more productive connections. However, there are clear benefits to scaling up. A sizable network, though it often requires a system like a Partner Relationship Management (PRM) solution to add automation for tasks and communication, can dramatically increase your reach and potential for leads.

Nevertheless, expansion is not without complications. A larger network brings a diversity of needs and exceptions, requiring a more complex and nuanced approach to partner relations. Alongside, it demands a more experienced team to navigate the increased volume of edge cases and unique scenarios that inevitably arise.

In summary, the decision between a small or large partner network must be weighed against your organizational structure, resource availability, and strategic goals. Whether you lean towards quality or quantity, both paths can lay the groundwork for a flourishing partnership ecosystem - you just have to figure out how you want your partner strategy to look like.

Personalization vs scale dilemmas

As organizations expand their partner bases, the expectations for personalized interactions remain high. Tailoring the approach to meet the needs of different partnership levels within the partner network can be an effective strategy.

For example, entry-level partners such as the 'bronze' tier might receive support through a collective inbox, without a stringent Service Level Agreements (SLA). Meanwhile, 'platinum' partners, who typically represent a higher level of investment and return, could be afforded privileged direct communication channels like a hotline to the CEO. This tiered approach strikes a balance between personalized attention and the practicalities of scale.

Achieving this balance requires a strategic organizational structure that’s supported by a well-written partnership agreement and IT systems to manage this. By aligning resources appropriately, companies can ensure that all partners feel valued, from bronze to platinum, which is key to fostering successful business partnerships.

This tiered method helps manage the personalization vs. scale dilemma and can be adapted as the partner network or the organizational capacity changes.

Onboarding dilemmas

Navigating the complexities of partner onboarding is crucial yet challenging. Striking the right balance between personal touch and efficiency can make or break the process. Some organizations opt for individual meetings to create a connection with each new partner. While labor-intensive, this hands-on approach often yields a stronger relationship. Conversely, monthly or quarterly group onboarding sessions can save time but may not address specific needs or foster the same level of intimacy.

Embracing technology, a Learning Management System (LMS) or an online course can automate much of the onboarding. This method ensures consistency in the information disseminated and allows partners to self-pace their learning. However, potential partners may crave more personal interaction.

A well-received compromise involves an initial dedicated onboarding call to establish rapport, followed by an automated enablement process. This hybrid method maintains efficiency while personalizing the experience. Regular check-in calls, be it monthly or quarterly, can reinforce the support network, helping partners feel valued and ensuring they remain aligned with the goals of your business partnership.

Choosing the right approach requires assessing your organizational structure and capacity while considering the needs of your partner network for a successful business partnership. This is all based on the decisions you make in your partner strategy.

Best of luck!

Still running your partnerships in Excel?

Let me show you a better way

Still running your partnerships in Excel?